Latest News:

A government lawyer acknowledged Monday that the Trump administration will miss its first court-imposed deadline to reunite about 100 immigrant children under age 5 with their parents. Department of Justice attorney Sarah Fabian said during a court hearing that federal authorities reunited two families and expect to reunite an additional 59 by Tuesday’s deadline. She said the other cases are more complicated, including parents who have been deported or are in prison facing criminal charges, and would require more time to complete reunions. U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw, who ordered the administration to reunite families separated as part of President Donald Trump’s “zero tolerance” immigration policy, said he will hold another hearing Tuesday morning to get an update on the remaining cases. He said he was encouraged to see “real progress” in the complicated reunification process after a busy weekend when officials from multiple federal agencies tried to sync up parents and children who are spread across the country. STORY FROM LENDINGTREE Crush your mortgage interest with a 15 yr fixed “Tomorrow is the deadline. I do recognize that there are some groups of parents who are going to fall into a category where it’s impossible to reunite by tomorrow,” he said. “I am very encouraged by the progress. I’m optimistic.” Lee Gelernt, an American Civil Liberties Union attorney who leads a lawsuit against the federal government, sounded more skeptical. When asked by the judge if he believed the government was in full compliance of the court order, Gelernt said there was much more work to be done. “Let me put it this way: I think the government in the last 48 hours has taken significant steps,” he said. “We just don’t know how much effort the government has made to find released parents. I don’t think there’s been full compliance.” U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw, based in San Diego. U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw, based in San Diego. (Photo: U.S. District Court) The difficulty in reuniting the first 100 children shows the challenge that lies ahead as the Trump administration braces for another deadline in two weeks to reunite nearly 3,000 older children – up to age 17 – with their parents. The process is complicated because of all the different situations that emerged over the weekend. The government initially identified 102 children under age 5 who needed to be reunited but removed three children from that list because investigations into their cases revealed that those children came with adults who were not their parents, Fabian said. Twelve parents were found to be in federal and state custody on criminal charges, making a reunification impossible since the government can’t transfer minors to state and local prisons to protect the well-being of the child. Nine parents were deported, and the government established contact with only four of them, Fabian said. Four children had been scheduled to be released from government custody to relatives who weren’t their parents, leading the government to question whether to allow that process to be completed or to redirect the child back to a parent. Gelernt said he understood many of the hurdles but urged the judge to force the government to scrap its time-consuming investigation into every single case and start a 48-hour clock to reunify families that remain separated by Tuesday. Sabraw said he would decide that during Tuesday’s hearing. Fabian said one of the silver linings of the busy weekend is that her office worked closely with its challengers at the ACLU to share information on each child’s case, to ensure that representatives from immigration advocacy groups and volunteer organizations could be present during each reunification. Gelernt said they’re doing that to help the parents, who are often released from custody with no money and nowhere to go. Fabian said that coordination has led to a more formalized process between government agencies and with the immigrants’ lawyers that should make reunifications go more smoothly in the coming weeks. “I think this process over the weekend helped us see what information, and in what form, is the most useful to share,” she said. “I’d like to make that as efficient a process as possible.” -

Monday, July 9, 2018

Trump denies US opposition to WHO breastfeeding resolution -

Monday, July 9, 2018

Mwen se moun nan Panyòl -

Monday, July 9, 2018

ZILE PAM NAN -

Monday, July 9, 2018

Havana plane crash leaves more than 100 dead -

Saturday, May 19, 2018

Shia cleric Moqtada Sadr bloc wins Iraq elections -

Saturday, May 19, 2018

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott: ‘We need to do more than just pray for the victims and their families’ -

Saturday, May 19, 2018

Donald Trump says he will meet North Korea’s Kim Jong Un on June 12 in Singapore -

Thursday, May 10, 2018

Trump tells FBI: ‘I have your back 100%’ -

Friday, December 15, 2017

Mueller requests emails from Trump campaign data firm: report -

Friday, December 15, 2017

GOP changes child tax credit in bid to win Rubio’s vote -

Friday, December 15, 2017

Trump Jr. is berated for tweet about ‘Obama’s FCC’ chair, net ‘neutality’ -

Friday, December 15, 2017

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to marry on 19 May 2018 -

Friday, December 15, 2017

Walt Disney buys Murdoch’s Fox for $52.4bn -

Thursday, December 14, 2017

Roy Moore says Alabama election ‘tainted’ by outside groups -

Thursday, December 14, 2017

Eric Holder warns GOP: ‘Any attempt to remove Bob Mueller will not be tolerated’ -

Thursday, December 14, 2017

Former British prime minister: Trump attacks on press are ‘dangerous’ -

Thursday, December 14, 2017

China says war must not be allowed on Korean peninsula -

Thursday, December 14, 2017

Megyn Kelly left Fox News in part due to O’Reilly: report -

Saturday, April 15, 2017

North Korea warns against U.S. ‘hysteria’ as it marks founder’s birth -

Friday, April 14, 2017

Haiti, le Peuple entre l’enclume et le marteau!

Michel J. Martelly

QuestCinq.com*

By Jean-Wisly Simon    

Pouvoir et opposition  vs  la Constitution

Haiti, le Peuple est entre l’enclume et le marteau: Les partis politiques, President Martelly et tous ceux qui reclament ‘son depart force’ doivent lire et relire la Constitution de 1987 sur laquelle, le President a ete elu en 2011. Tout de suite,  je dois ajouter que je ne suis ni un  partisan du President de la Republique ni un adherent de sa philosophie politique. Je veux que cela soit clair pour tout le monde (disclosure).

Certes, nous sommes tous d’accord sur un point le pouvoir de Port Au Prince deplace, arrête, revoque, nomme et se serve des ressources disponibles sans tenir compte des normes republicaines. Au regard de la Cosnttitution, les citoyens voire l’opposition haitienne ont un droit de regard sur les activites du pouvoir de Joseph M. Martelly.

Ce n’est pas un cadeau du pouvoir mais un acquis de la Constitution de 1987:

SECTION C
DE LA LIBERTÉ D’EXPRESSION

Article 28:
“Tout Haïtien ou toute haïtienne a le droit d’exprimer librement ses opinions, en toute matière par la voie qu’il choisit.”

Les citoyesn, partis politiques et/ou groupements doivent aussi songer que la democratie a ses regles. La plus importante, a mon avis, c’est le pouvoir des voteurs/electeurs d’aller aux urnes afin de choisir leur dirrigeants pour un mandat determine. La Constitution de 1987 nous dit:

SECTION A
DU PRÉSIDENT DE LA RÉPUBLIQUE

Article 134:
“Le Président de la République est élu au suffrage universel direct à la majorité absolue des votants. si celle-ci n’est pas obtenue au premeir tour, il est procédé à un second tour.
Seuls peuvent s’y présenter les deux (2) candidats qui, le cas échánt, après retrait de candidats plus favorisés, se trouvent avoir recueilli le plus grand nombre de voix au premier tour.”

Article 134.1:
“La durée du mandat présidentiel est de cinq (5) ans. Cette période commence et se terminera le 7 février suivant la date des élections.”

Il n’est pas question que le President s’en va, avant la fin de son mandat.Toutefois, on doit protester contre les decisions arbitraires mais pas contre le mandat. Les gens qui se respectent, comprennent qu’il faut respecter les principes democratiques.

Au President de la Republique soit un ‘leader, un chef d’etat’! Ne jouer pas avec la fonction comme si nous sommes tous des gamins dans votre cours. Trop de crises unitiles, la majorite d’entr’elles sont nees crees/fabriquees par vous ou votre entourage.

Au President de la Republique vous depensez trop d’argent pour rien. Le peuple a besoin de se sentir que vous comprendriez son ‘etat de vivre’. Vous nommez trop de gens, l’executive devient une vache! Plus de lait, Mr. President! Le gouvernement est trop grand.

Enfin, Mr. le President, personne peut vous derober votre droit:

SECTION B
DES ATTRIBUTIONS DU PRÉSIDENT DE LA RÉPUBLIQUE

Article 136:
“Le Président de la République, Chef de l’Etat, veille au respect et à l’exécution de la Constitution et à la stabilité des institutions. Il assure le fonctionnement régulier des pouvoirs publics ainsi que la continuité de l’Etat.”

Maintenant, puisque la constitution vous donne ces pouvoirs et vous les comprenez, Mr le President de la Republique; on peut aller dormir ce soir en paix puisque vous allez epargner Haiti d’une crise electorale. Le President va demander aux gens mal places au CEP de vider les lieux au non de l’article 136 et de la Patrie qu’il cherit.

Aux partis de l’opposition, c’est le temps de se prononcer sur les decisions. Quand au mandat, il faut attendre les prochaines elections presidentielles ou la Haute Cour de Justice prevue par la Constitution. Entre temps, travaillons ensemble pour donner de l’espoir aux Haitiens!

*Je juge qu’il est approprie de vous faire part de cet article publie le 14 Octobre 2012…(14 octobre 2012 )

Bon weekend a tous et toutes!

 

Comments are closed.

Yahoo! Status Checker by Techya