Latest News:

Democratic National Convention: What to watch for at Biden’s nomination party -

Monday, August 17, 2020

Republicans dismiss Trump proposal to delay election -

Thursday, July 30, 2020

Obama calls filibuster ‘Jim Crow relic,’ backs new Voting Rights Act bill -

Thursday, July 30, 2020

Donald Trump suggests delay to 2020 US presidential election -

Thursday, July 30, 2020

US teenager wins $3m playing computer game Fortnite -

Sunday, July 28, 2019

Dozens of mourners ‘killed by Boko Haram’ at a funeral in north Nigeria -

Sunday, July 28, 2019

Dan Coats, Trump’s top intel official, to depart White House -

Sunday, July 28, 2019

Donald Trump’s power dynamic with Nancy Pelosi will be on full display at the State of the Union -

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

Pennsylvania poll: Clinton up by 9 points – -

Thursday, July 28, 2016

Your Ports!! – -

Wednesday, July 13, 2016

In shadow of Brexit, NATO considers Russian deterrence – -

Wednesday, July 6, 2016

Italy vs Spain,England vs Iceland; Boston Red Sox vs Tampa Bay Rays – -

Monday, June 27, 2016

Foreign diplomats voicing alarm to U.S. officials about Trump – -

Monday, March 7, 2016

Trump grants press credentials to ‘pro-white’ radio show host – -

Wednesday, March 2, 2016

Supreme Court rejects Arizona sheriff’s appeal on immigration – -

Tuesday, January 19, 2016

Hawking: Humans at risk of lethal ‘own goal’ – -

Tuesday, January 19, 2016

ObamaCare supporters see wall of resistance cracking in South – -

Saturday, November 21, 2015

Attaque revendiquée par l’EI au Bangladesh: un mort et 80 blessés -

Saturday, October 24, 2015

Russia says wants Syria elections, ready to help Free Syrian Army -

Saturday, October 24, 2015

Hillary Clinton calls Republican’s impeachment vow ‘pathetic’ -

Saturday, October 24, 2015

Obama, Clinton start ’16 dance

By Niall Stanage and Amie Parnes – 06/09/14

President Obama and Hillary Clinton have begun a delicate dance to 2016.

As the former Secretary of State edges toward a presidential run, she is putting some daylight between herself and the man she would succeed, on issues ranging from the release of Bowe Bergdahl to the civil war in Syria.

In Clinton’s new book “Hard Choices,” to be released Tuesday, she says she disagreed with Obama on Syria and advocated in vain for the arming of rebels fighting the forces of President Bashar al-Assad.

On the Bergdahl swap, Clinton has said she would not second-guess Obama’s decision even as some former administration officials have told reporters that she would have driven a harder bargain with the Taliban.Adding to the intrigue, Obama and Clinton had lunch at the White House two days before the Taliban handed Bergdahl over, a meeting that did not appear on the president’s official schedule.

Once rivals, Obama and Clinton both profess that they are now strong allies — the president referred to her recently as a “really, really good” friend.

Yet already they are sometimes at cross-purposes, with Obama’s team guarding his legacy even as he struggles with low approval ratings, and Clinton’s team readying for a possible White House run in which she will inevitably have to distance her political brand from that of her old boss.

The two camps have the power to inflict damage on one another, and Clinton, Obama and their loyalists will have to work carefully to prevent old wounds from reopening.

The release of “Hard Choices” presents an opportunity to show how far they’ve come.

By common consent, the enmity in the wake of the 2008 primary was felt more acutely by the respective staffs than by the candidates.

Now, the leading liberal super-PAC that supported Obama’s 2012 reelection campaign, Priorities USA Action, has been retooled as a pro-Hillary vehicle with Jim Messina, who managed Obama’s 2012 bid, serving as co-chairman. Other Obama loyalists, such as field directors Jeremy Bird and Mitch Stewart, are working with the Ready for Hillary super-PAC.

Another key Obama player, Tommy Vietor, who bashed the Clinton camp in the 2008 primary and went on to serve as an assistant press secretary at the White House, is working directly on Clinton’s publicity campaign for her book.

Team Clinton reached out to Vietor a few weeks ago to see if he would offer his assistance for one month as the former secretary crisscrosses the country to promote her book. In addition to handling reporters’ queries, last week he was among the aides who sat with Clinton at her home for an interview with ABC’s Diane Sawyer.

“It’s a reminder that there’s not an Obama team and a Clinton team anymore,” Vietor told The Hill. “The primary was a long time ago.”

Philippe Reines, a longtime top adviser to Clinton, said of Vietor’s involvement, “The communications between us all — during State and since — was and is so regular that it couldn’t be less remarkable. So we didn’t need Tommy as a bridge. We wanted Tommy because he knows the foreign policy record of the last five years as well as any other human being.”

The Clinton team also has tight relationships with several people inside the West Wing.

The working relationship between White House chief of staff Denis McDonough and Clinton’s longtime chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, was prickly at the start of the administration, but is now close. During Clinton’s tenure at State, the two aides were known to meet for breakfast on Saturday mornings to discuss looming issues.

Mills and Reines, in turn, each have close relationships with John Podesta, a veteran of Bill Clinton’s White House who is now a special advisor to Obama.

Another key insider: Jake Sullivan, Vice President Biden’s national security advisor who served as Clinton’s director of policy planning and deputy chief of staff during her tenure at the State Department.

This web of connections, and the professions of warmth from Obama and Clinton themselves, allows supporters to proclaim that all is rosy.

“Their relationship is solid,” said one Democratic strategist familiar with both sides, adding, “No cracks whatsoever. Zero.”

But, more than ever the two sides — and the Democrats who float between the two worlds — are being forced to explain how their policies intersect. A group of Democrats met recently at the White House with communications director Jen Palmieri and Ben Rhodes, the deputy national security adviser for strategic communication, recently to discuss issues including foreign policy.

While “Hard Choices” wasn’t a planned topic of discussion, the group briefly discussed matters and decided that there shouldn’t be any distance between Obama and Clinton on matters of foreign policy.

Still, those proclamations of a harmonious relationship, or a claim such as Vietor’s that “the president’s record on foreign policy and the secretary’s record on foreign policy are the same” gloss over some obvious tensions.

Back in March, Clinton declared herself “personally skeptical” about a final nuclear deal with Iran, arguing that the odds of reaching a final deal were “not good.” The precise outcome about which she was expressing doubt is the end-goal upon which Obama’s approach is predicated.

On the Bergdahl controversy, Team Clinton directed reporters toward remarks she made in a speech at Denver as supposed evidence of her backing of Obama’s position. But, in fact, those comments included abundant wiggle room.

“The government of Qatar has made representations, even guarantees, that these five Taliban prisoners from Guantanamo will not be let out of Qatar,” she said. “And I certainly hope they follow through on the assurances that they’ve provided.”

Such statements are yet more evidence of the tricky balancing act that Clinton must execute, a dilemma that is likely to become only more acute as 2016 draws near.

“It’s difficult because the secretary of State role that she had is going to be an essential part of what she sells to voters,” said Princeton public affairs professor Julian Zelizer. “On the other hand, she wants to say, ‘Some things in the administration, at least since I left, are not going so well.’ You can’t easily take credit and say ‘except for a few things’. But that’s what she has to do.”

Republican strategist Ron Bonjean said Clinton’s role serving Obama could ultimately be a liability.

“Foreign policy is a weak spot for Obama and Hillary Clinton is getting roped into it because of her term as Secretary of State,” he said. “The closer she moves to a presidential run, the more she has to figure out how to distance herself.”

Democratic strategist Chris Lehane, however, argued that Clinton has one advantage over heirs apparent during previous administrations, such as his old boss, Al Gore.

Referring to Gore’s run in 2000, while serving as Bill Clinton’s vice president, Lehane noted, “We knew we had to demonstrate that he was more than a Number Two. I think what’s different [for Hillary Clinton] is that she is famous, well-known, well-established. The tension where a vice-president feels a compelling need to go out and assert themselves doesn’t exist in that way.”

Still, even if Clinton is already in a singular position, some argue that her desire to reinforce her distinct political position is plenty strong.

“I think she values being at arm’s length,” said one Democratic strategist.

Source: The Hill

Comments are closed.

Yahoo! Status Checker by Techya